Valorant dma Firmware

[Toxinitx]

hello, im completely new to dma and wanted to ask for some help to find the right firmware and cheat to actually use it. as far as iheard, the cheat actually doesnt really matter that much but bgk is supposed to be really good. can anyone confirm that and maybe show me any good firmware to use?
thanks in advance
dc: pfand_sammler

[milanyy4]

Hit me up

[Toxic.dll]

DMA in 2025 is killed, Epic Games and Riot are working together in DMA detections

[Garfield_]

Originally Posted by Toxic.dll

DMA in 2025 is killed, Epic Games and Riot are working together in DMA detections

Is 2025 really the end of the dma era, or are we at least moving in that direction?

[johanneshb]

Originally Posted by Garfield_

Is 2025 really the end of the dma era, or are we at least moving in that direction?

Yes and no. If you properly simulate a device and know what you are doing, epic and vgk simply cant just work together to solve it. The very strict laws they have to follow (specially in EU) puts them far back.

Eventually most of dma cards will be detected due to poor use of firmwares. As long as you stay a head and continuesly updates your firmware, there won’t be any noticeable effect.

Most 1:1 firmwares out there claims to be 1:1 unique. The «definition» by 1:1 from fw sellers is unique id, might even get unique device if youre lucky. However the same method is used, and the same read intervals. And most people do NOT know how to properly simulate a device.

You can change the device id, to make it look like another device, but if you look closely to the firmwares being sold, they do not behave equal to the device they are supposedly being, which leads to detection. For now mostly manual checks has to be done to properly find out, but there will soon enough be AI systems that will detect this^^

[Toxic.dll]

Originally Posted by johanneshb

Yes and no. If you properly simulate a device and know what you are doing, epic and vgk simply cant just work together to solve it. The very strict laws they have to follow (specially in EU) puts them far back.

Eventually most of dma cards will be detected due to poor use of firmwares. As long as you stay a head and continuesly updates your firmware, there won’t be any noticeable effect.

Most 1:1 firmwares out there claims to be 1:1 unique. The «definition» by 1:1 from fw sellers is unique id, might even get unique device if youre lucky. However the same method is used, and the same read intervals. And most people do NOT know how to properly simulate a device.

You can change the device id, to make it look like another device, but if you look closely to the firmwares being sold, they do not behave equal to the device they are supposedly being, which leads to detection. For now mostly manual checks has to be done to properly find out, but there will soon enough be AI systems that will detect this^^

Its not possible to simulate a device once the data are just not real, they start dumping firmwares of sus people and you cant do much agaisnt it

Originally Posted by johanneshb

Yes and no. If you properly simulate a device and know what you are doing, epic and vgk simply cant just work together to solve it. The very strict laws they have to follow (specially in EU) puts them far back.

Eventually most of dma cards will be detected due to poor use of firmwares. As long as you stay a head and continuesly updates your firmware, there won’t be any noticeable effect.

Most 1:1 firmwares out there claims to be 1:1 unique. The «definition» by 1:1 from fw sellers is unique id, might even get unique device if youre lucky. However the same method is used, and the same read intervals. And most people do NOT know how to properly simulate a device.

You can change the device id, to make it look like another device, but if you look closely to the firmwares being sold, they do not behave equal to the device they are supposedly being, which leads to detection. For now mostly manual checks has to be done to properly find out, but there will soon enough be AI systems that will detect this^^

You agree with TOS, only EU its ass and i dont think GDPR block then for work if they protect the data

[johanneshb]

Originally Posted by Toxic.dll

Its not possible to simulate a device once the data are just not real, they start dumping firmwares of sus people and you cant do much agaisnt it



You agree with TOS, only EU its *** and i dont think GDPR block then for work if they protect the data

You can. Ive done it for several years with close to no issues, there has been 2 blocks that I am aware of, but never had any issues other than that. And one of them were unblocked rather quickly due to other people without dma reporting having issues(being blocked). There is so many ways to make a firmware that you simply can’t «dump» to solve it.

EU has super strict laws for anticheat yes, but there is still stright laws for anticheats in general. If they had no rules to follow they would be more even against cheating in general.

If it was as simple as «dumping sus people firmwares» there would be way way less cheaters. Yes, you can be «unlucky» and get caught, but in theory there will always be easier to find mistakes, than to prevent them. To prevent something, there has to be found something to prevent.

[Toxic.dll]

Originally Posted by johanneshb

You can. Ive done it for several years with close to no issues, there has been 2 blocks that I am aware of, but never had any issues other than that. And one of them were unblocked rather quickly due to other people without dma reporting having issues(being blocked). There is so many ways to make a firmware that you simply can’t «dump» to solve it.

EU has super strict laws for anticheat yes, but there is still stright laws for anticheats in general. If they had no rules to follow they would be more even against cheating in general.

If it was as simple as «dumping sus people firmwares» there would be way way less cheaters. Yes, you can be «unlucky» and get caught, but in theory there will always be easier to find mistakes, than to prevent them. To prevent something, there has to be found something to prevent.

Telling based on friends who i trust all are getting ******, no one can get same results as me in a private software even spending more $

They are old users of dma using since 2018, a lot of connections on DMA world but SURE these guys cant get smt good while all randoms can ?

Everyone i see flexing with dma was low radiant or barely immortal, and the ones who said its on top 10 never gave any proof

[Strawberry-Evo]

Many people talk about how good the firmware is. But when you get banned after purchasing, they'll say it was manually detected

[Toxic.dll]

Originally Posted by Strawberry-Evo

Many people talk about how good the firmware is. But when you get banned after purchasing, they'll say it was manually detected

99% Of DMA users are like that, banned on diamond = manual

[T1LTD0]

So what is the best option right now? Go back to regular one pc thing, or what?