Quote:
Originally Posted by zebleer
It was meh years ago but I redid it about a year ago & it's really good now. That's when PO experienced the most growth (after that upgrade). That was also the update I added native controller support, new UI, and the option to have 4 different aimbot configs at once assigned to different keys
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0x41^4
There’s nothing wrong with PO’s aimbot (many T250 with it); claims to the contrary mostly come from the same people who have been trying to damage PO’s reputation over the past year. You can see this pattern in their post history.
PO is less resource-intensive than other external options, has faster updates, and includes more safety features to protect users if there’s an anticheat update. Plus, Zebleer is highly active in the community, so if you have suggestions, he’s open to discussing them and may even implement your ideas.
On top of that, Zebleer has the best refund policy among cheat providers: if you try it for less than a day and aren’t satisfied, he’ll give you a refund. This policy alone shows the confidence he has in his product. Unlike most providers which don’t even offer refunds—or only let you switch to another game they sell…
The only other product I’d recommend is ProofCore, which has significantly improved their cheat to be less resource-intensive and generally more stable. However, the last time I used it, I didn’t try the aimbot, so I can’t comment on that feature.
|
I have used many different suppliers PO, IW, AA, SS, Aimex, Proofcore.
I really like PO because of its good security, good optimization, and good options. During the 2 months of using PO, I noticed that PO aimbot really didn't look natural to mnk users, so I commented on the forum so Zeb could see and consider fixing the aimbot. .
Even my cheat-using friends commented that PO aimbot was terrible and they had to switch to other providers.
So if Zeb reads this, hopefully Zeb will review PO aimbot to improve it better in the future.